Thursday 20 October 2011
After The Election
Unfortunately, not many of the candidates who were good enough to respond to our questions have actually been elected. However, we are leaving this blog live, so that you may see how well the successful ones are living up to their statements, and whether you regret the others not getting in.
Friday 14 October 2011
2011General Election Candidate Survey
Below are the responses that many of the more serious candidates have submitted to a questionnaire circulated by the Jersey Rights Association on issues of concern to our members. Further responses will be edited in on arrival.
They are sorted into St Helier by District, other parishes alphabetically, and Senatorial candidates. To keep the last group from being indigestibly long, I have split it into new and experienced candidates.
I have repeated the questionnaire at the head of each section, to save readers from extensive scrolling back and forth to refer to the questions.
On behalf of the JRA, I warmly thank all the candidates who have taken time out of their busy campaign schedules to write responses. I hope this helps them to communicate with like-minded voters.
A more polished presentation of this survey will appear at www.jerseyrights.org in due course, but as that site has suffered a technical problem in election week, of all times, this blog has been created as an emergency channel of publication.
David Rotherham
Chairman,
Jersey Rights Association
They are sorted into St Helier by District, other parishes alphabetically, and Senatorial candidates. To keep the last group from being indigestibly long, I have split it into new and experienced candidates.
I have repeated the questionnaire at the head of each section, to save readers from extensive scrolling back and forth to refer to the questions.
On behalf of the JRA, I warmly thank all the candidates who have taken time out of their busy campaign schedules to write responses. I hope this helps them to communicate with like-minded voters.
A more polished presentation of this survey will appear at www.jerseyrights.org in due course, but as that site has suffered a technical problem in election week, of all times, this blog has been created as an emergency channel of publication.
David Rotherham
Chairman,
Jersey Rights Association
St Helier 1
1 (a). Is it right that the number of Senators has been reduced, thus limiting
the choice for Islanders as a whole to choose their political leaders?
1 (b). If no, what would you seek to do about it?
2. The States Pension age is going to be progressively increased over the next few years. Would you support legislation preventing employers from compulsorily retiring people who have not yet qualified for their pension, to prevent them being left without any income other than such welfare as they may qualify for?
3 (a). Would you support measures to stabilise the population at current levels?
3 (b). If not, how do think Jersey can accommodate further population growth?
4. Who will have your support to be the next Chief Minister?
5. Would you like Jersey to move towards a more progressive tax system?
6. Do you think GST should be retained in its present form, abolished, reduced or increased?
7 (a). Is Ministerial Government working the way it was envisaged?
7 (b) If not, what would you do to remedy the situation?
8. With the long-term stagnation of the housing market, the private rental sector is once again growing in importance. Would you support an overhaul of tenancy law to strike a fairer balance of rights and duties between residents and landlords?
9. Do you have a view on whether the extensive importation of UK Civil Service managers on short contracts is beneficial, or whether there should be more emphasis on career development for local civil servants?
10. Which, if any, public services would you like to see the States cutting?
Would you support increased Social Security contributions, ring fenced to protect future pension & health benefits, but not as a way of raising income for the Treasury.
Judy Martin:-
1.(a). Yes
1.(b). But we need one type only of States member
2. Yes
3. (a). Yes
4. Alan Breckon
5. Yes
7.(a). No
7.(b). We need more people in the Ministers, but all assistants should be voted by House
8. Yes and have
9. Progression Training
11. Yes
Keith Shaw – St Helier 1:-
Keith Shaw - St Helier 1
1 (a ) Whether it is right or not, we now have a democratically reached decision. My personal preference would have probably been to remove the Connetables from the States Chamber.
2. This is a difficult and not easily answered question but I will try my best to consider the options.
We currently have a high number of unemployed people, especially young people who desperately need work. Unless there is a "reasonable" retirement age for employees, there is going to be tension between the jobs that are available, and the opportunities for the unemployed. The raising of the retirement age however could no doubt cause problems for those who, if made to retire before they had planned, may suffer difficulties and hardship. It will not be easy for them to secure employment during that interim period and they may have to pay Social Security contributions in order that their final pension is not affected (unless these are covered by the Social Security Department because of their circumstances)
I think the way to proceed would be to;
1. Make it automatically unfair for an employer to dismiss on retirement grounds unless it can be objectively justified.
if an employee is compulsory retired before the normal retirement period, cover their stamp until they can secure other employment
3. In the event that an employee is compulsory retired there must thereafter be a job filled within the company for a period of no less than 2 years or financial penalties imposed.
What is more important is that those employees who are able to retire early e.g. Fire Service, Police, Ambulance etc are prevented from doing so, or at least are not re employed within the Public sector. The normal retirement age should apply to all the service sectors, far too many skills are lost too soon.
3 (a) No. I would seek to reduce it by making the following changes to the law/s.
Repatriate any non - local (e.g. less than 5 year residency) who has been awarded a custodial sentence in the courts of more than 6 months.
Tie employment into accommodation rights and make employment conditional upon secure and permanent accommodation.
Anyone registered in Guest houses, lodging houses or temporary accommodation only hold specific jobs e.g. temporary hospitality/ agriculture for max 9 month period in any 12 month period.
Look carefully at what impact immigration has had on employment and all services; e.g. health, housing and benefits.
4. My initial preference for Chief Minister would be either Paul Routier or Ian Le Marquand but I am not impressed that Ian le Marquand has voted against an open vote as transparency is crucial in the States. I am gaining more of a positive impression of Ian Gorst but would reserve my final decision until I have more knowledge of each candidate that puts themselves forward.
5. There is an imbalance in general taxation which must be looked at urgently to create a more level playing field. It cannot be right that businesses that are not local are allowed to escape taxation.
6. My preferred tax system would be "user pays" especially in relation to luxury items. If GST has to stay at 5% on essential items we should be looking to reduce that as quickly as possible. Luxury items could be taxed at 10% to provide revenue to allow for a gradual decrease on essential items. Items which would attract 10% would be; perfumes and makeup, spa services, beauty services, meals out, alcohol, cigarettes etc. I would also tax boat fuel at 10% other than fishing boats which should be taxed anyway at the lower level. Tax should also be added to tractor diesel fuel and incrementally increased for large vehicles with high cc's and carbon emissions.
7. (a) The island "cherry picked" the Clothier recommendations and has got the government it deserves at this time. No, it is not working as too many important decisions are being taken by too few people.
7 (b) I would prefer not to answer this as I do not have sufficient knowledge at this time to make an informed statement. (My initial preference however would seek to involve all states members across all Departments to ensure decisions are more democratically made.)
8 There is still unacceptable accommodation in the island although the situation has improved vastly in the last ten years. See answer 3(a) which would alleviate some of the pressure on the market.
9 It is not just the civil service which is guilty of importing staff on contract but the private sector too. There should be a benefit to an employer to train and put in place succession planning. it may be a "tax break" of some kind, reward or recognition. There is some perverse belief that local people are not "up to" the job but some of the biggest mistakes and problem we have seen, have been caused by UK appointed personnel. In addition, those that do not relocate their families have little to lose when things go pear shaped on their
watch; they simply go back to the UK or elsewhere. Any appointment which is made to a non local must be conditional upon ;
a. The person actually lives on the island all the time and not commute backwards and forwards
b. The Appointment is for a specified period of time in order that they train someone to do the job
c. If b is not achieved, no new person can be appointed to that or a similar position for a period of 3 years.
10 Every user of public services believes theirs should be untouched but hard decisions have to be taken. I would make more use of community probation orders and use Prisoners to do certain types of work. Parks and gardens, road maintenance, beach clearing etc. A reduction in sentence could be considered for those who participate. There could also be public/ private partnerships for some services which are appropriate eg cleaning services but only if robust and proper service level agreements are in place. If the service provider does not deliver quality service, terminate the contract and give it to another provider.
11 Yes and raise the upper limit.
Please bear in mind that my. responses are based upon my knowledge at this-time and I reserve the right to change any opinion in the light of new or different information coming to my attention.
Mary O'Keeffe-Burgher – St Helier 1:-
1(a)
No
1(b)
I would like to reinstate the senators but as it has gone to the prive council in Westminster it would be almost impossible to revert in the near future.
2
No
3(a) The estimated growth in population over the last years should come in at 5000 people .. This will be confirmed when the recent census results are available.
Population growth is a sign of a growing economy. However I believe that there should be entrance and exit visas for everyone and work permits.
I also firmly believe that the Draconian non qualified housing category should be abolished. All people after living here for 5 year should be allowed to buy, with limits i.e. you cant work for 5 years prior to retirement the buy and retire etc.
The rental market should be open to everyone with a work permit.
3(b) By having a work permit people would be expected to leave the islands when the time runs out. For example if you needed to bring in contractors for large development everyone brought in would understand that when the work permit runs out it would be time to leave.
People working in Jersey weather born here or not should not be made to feel like second class citizens.
4. re the next chief minister
The process laid down for electing the Chief Minister is set out in Standing Orders. In summary: following an election, any candidate should:
i) Be nominated by at least 6 elected members;
ii) Set-out the candidate’s vision for a Strategic Policy;
iii) Set-out the manner in which he or she would propose to discharge the responsibilities as Chief Minister; then later,
Iv) Address the Assembly for 10 minutes;
V) Be questioned by elected members for 40 minutes
At that stage a ballot or ballots of members will be taken.
The appropriate time to discuss the Chief Minister role is after the elections. The real question here is who I want to be affiliated with..I want people to decide on me as an independent candidate. Mary O'Keeffe-Burgher.
5 I think we need to look at UK companies operating out of Jersey who pay no tax. This needs to be examined and a tax structure amended accordingly.
But when it comes to taxing high net worth earners remember that these people are extremely mobile and will move somewhere else. £135K a year is better than nothing!!
6 I do not want to see GST raise beyond 5%. People in the parish hate GST but I do understand the value of it and why it is in place.
5% GST gives us £85 million in to the States pot. The GVA has reduced in the last 2 years y nearly £500 million and we need to make up this extra income. So until we come up with new and innovative solutions I believe it is here to stay but hopefully in the short term.
GST has many features that make it an attractive revenue-raising option for Jersey:
It is a more stable revenue source than many other taxes.
Substantial amounts of revenue are generated, even at relatively low tax rates.
It is fair, since it affects the broadest range of taxpayers - ensuring that those who benefit from public services also contribute to their funding. (Previously, about 25% of eligible taxpayers did not pay any tax in Jersey).
It is an efficient and relatively inexpensive tax to administer - with operating costs typically in the region of only 1% of the tax yield.
The compulsory issue of tax receipts and invoices provides an audit trail that makes the system less susceptible to fraud and evasion.
GST does not tax investments and savings. It encourages saving rather than spending and indirectly rewards enterprise and encourages economic resilience.
Since GST only applies to the domestic consumption of goods and services, the GST incurred in the process of producing exports can be identified and refunded, assisting exporters to be competitive in the world market.
Visitors to Jersey will contribute to the Island’s revenue.
7 Ministerial government is not working as well as it could. Ostensibly because only elements of the Clothier report were followed.
It this it needs an internal review.
8 Yes absolutely, a priority.
9 I would prefer career development for the local civil servants first.
10 I would not like to see ANY services being cut in the states.
11 Yes
the choice for Islanders as a whole to choose their political leaders?
1 (b). If no, what would you seek to do about it?
2. The States Pension age is going to be progressively increased over the next few years. Would you support legislation preventing employers from compulsorily retiring people who have not yet qualified for their pension, to prevent them being left without any income other than such welfare as they may qualify for?
3 (a). Would you support measures to stabilise the population at current levels?
3 (b). If not, how do think Jersey can accommodate further population growth?
4. Who will have your support to be the next Chief Minister?
5. Would you like Jersey to move towards a more progressive tax system?
6. Do you think GST should be retained in its present form, abolished, reduced or increased?
7 (a). Is Ministerial Government working the way it was envisaged?
7 (b) If not, what would you do to remedy the situation?
8. With the long-term stagnation of the housing market, the private rental sector is once again growing in importance. Would you support an overhaul of tenancy law to strike a fairer balance of rights and duties between residents and landlords?
9. Do you have a view on whether the extensive importation of UK Civil Service managers on short contracts is beneficial, or whether there should be more emphasis on career development for local civil servants?
10. Which, if any, public services would you like to see the States cutting?
Would you support increased Social Security contributions, ring fenced to protect future pension & health benefits, but not as a way of raising income for the Treasury.
Judy Martin:-
1.(a). Yes
1.(b). But we need one type only of States member
2. Yes
3. (a). Yes
4. Alan Breckon
5. Yes
7.(a). No
7.(b). We need more people in the Ministers, but all assistants should be voted by House
8. Yes and have
9. Progression Training
11. Yes
Keith Shaw – St Helier 1:-
Keith Shaw - St Helier 1
1 (a ) Whether it is right or not, we now have a democratically reached decision. My personal preference would have probably been to remove the Connetables from the States Chamber.
2. This is a difficult and not easily answered question but I will try my best to consider the options.
We currently have a high number of unemployed people, especially young people who desperately need work. Unless there is a "reasonable" retirement age for employees, there is going to be tension between the jobs that are available, and the opportunities for the unemployed. The raising of the retirement age however could no doubt cause problems for those who, if made to retire before they had planned, may suffer difficulties and hardship. It will not be easy for them to secure employment during that interim period and they may have to pay Social Security contributions in order that their final pension is not affected (unless these are covered by the Social Security Department because of their circumstances)
I think the way to proceed would be to;
1. Make it automatically unfair for an employer to dismiss on retirement grounds unless it can be objectively justified.
if an employee is compulsory retired before the normal retirement period, cover their stamp until they can secure other employment
3. In the event that an employee is compulsory retired there must thereafter be a job filled within the company for a period of no less than 2 years or financial penalties imposed.
What is more important is that those employees who are able to retire early e.g. Fire Service, Police, Ambulance etc are prevented from doing so, or at least are not re employed within the Public sector. The normal retirement age should apply to all the service sectors, far too many skills are lost too soon.
3 (a) No. I would seek to reduce it by making the following changes to the law/s.
Repatriate any non - local (e.g. less than 5 year residency) who has been awarded a custodial sentence in the courts of more than 6 months.
Tie employment into accommodation rights and make employment conditional upon secure and permanent accommodation.
Anyone registered in Guest houses, lodging houses or temporary accommodation only hold specific jobs e.g. temporary hospitality/ agriculture for max 9 month period in any 12 month period.
Look carefully at what impact immigration has had on employment and all services; e.g. health, housing and benefits.
4. My initial preference for Chief Minister would be either Paul Routier or Ian Le Marquand but I am not impressed that Ian le Marquand has voted against an open vote as transparency is crucial in the States. I am gaining more of a positive impression of Ian Gorst but would reserve my final decision until I have more knowledge of each candidate that puts themselves forward.
5. There is an imbalance in general taxation which must be looked at urgently to create a more level playing field. It cannot be right that businesses that are not local are allowed to escape taxation.
6. My preferred tax system would be "user pays" especially in relation to luxury items. If GST has to stay at 5% on essential items we should be looking to reduce that as quickly as possible. Luxury items could be taxed at 10% to provide revenue to allow for a gradual decrease on essential items. Items which would attract 10% would be; perfumes and makeup, spa services, beauty services, meals out, alcohol, cigarettes etc. I would also tax boat fuel at 10% other than fishing boats which should be taxed anyway at the lower level. Tax should also be added to tractor diesel fuel and incrementally increased for large vehicles with high cc's and carbon emissions.
7. (a) The island "cherry picked" the Clothier recommendations and has got the government it deserves at this time. No, it is not working as too many important decisions are being taken by too few people.
7 (b) I would prefer not to answer this as I do not have sufficient knowledge at this time to make an informed statement. (My initial preference however would seek to involve all states members across all Departments to ensure decisions are more democratically made.)
8 There is still unacceptable accommodation in the island although the situation has improved vastly in the last ten years. See answer 3(a) which would alleviate some of the pressure on the market.
9 It is not just the civil service which is guilty of importing staff on contract but the private sector too. There should be a benefit to an employer to train and put in place succession planning. it may be a "tax break" of some kind, reward or recognition. There is some perverse belief that local people are not "up to" the job but some of the biggest mistakes and problem we have seen, have been caused by UK appointed personnel. In addition, those that do not relocate their families have little to lose when things go pear shaped on their
watch; they simply go back to the UK or elsewhere. Any appointment which is made to a non local must be conditional upon ;
a. The person actually lives on the island all the time and not commute backwards and forwards
b. The Appointment is for a specified period of time in order that they train someone to do the job
c. If b is not achieved, no new person can be appointed to that or a similar position for a period of 3 years.
10 Every user of public services believes theirs should be untouched but hard decisions have to be taken. I would make more use of community probation orders and use Prisoners to do certain types of work. Parks and gardens, road maintenance, beach clearing etc. A reduction in sentence could be considered for those who participate. There could also be public/ private partnerships for some services which are appropriate eg cleaning services but only if robust and proper service level agreements are in place. If the service provider does not deliver quality service, terminate the contract and give it to another provider.
11 Yes and raise the upper limit.
Please bear in mind that my. responses are based upon my knowledge at this-time and I reserve the right to change any opinion in the light of new or different information coming to my attention.
Mary O'Keeffe-Burgher – St Helier 1:-
1(a)
No
1(b)
I would like to reinstate the senators but as it has gone to the prive council in Westminster it would be almost impossible to revert in the near future.
2
No
3(a) The estimated growth in population over the last years should come in at 5000 people .. This will be confirmed when the recent census results are available.
Population growth is a sign of a growing economy. However I believe that there should be entrance and exit visas for everyone and work permits.
I also firmly believe that the Draconian non qualified housing category should be abolished. All people after living here for 5 year should be allowed to buy, with limits i.e. you cant work for 5 years prior to retirement the buy and retire etc.
The rental market should be open to everyone with a work permit.
3(b) By having a work permit people would be expected to leave the islands when the time runs out. For example if you needed to bring in contractors for large development everyone brought in would understand that when the work permit runs out it would be time to leave.
People working in Jersey weather born here or not should not be made to feel like second class citizens.
4. re the next chief minister
The process laid down for electing the Chief Minister is set out in Standing Orders. In summary: following an election, any candidate should:
i) Be nominated by at least 6 elected members;
ii) Set-out the candidate’s vision for a Strategic Policy;
iii) Set-out the manner in which he or she would propose to discharge the responsibilities as Chief Minister; then later,
Iv) Address the Assembly for 10 minutes;
V) Be questioned by elected members for 40 minutes
At that stage a ballot or ballots of members will be taken.
The appropriate time to discuss the Chief Minister role is after the elections. The real question here is who I want to be affiliated with..I want people to decide on me as an independent candidate. Mary O'Keeffe-Burgher.
5 I think we need to look at UK companies operating out of Jersey who pay no tax. This needs to be examined and a tax structure amended accordingly.
But when it comes to taxing high net worth earners remember that these people are extremely mobile and will move somewhere else. £135K a year is better than nothing!!
6 I do not want to see GST raise beyond 5%. People in the parish hate GST but I do understand the value of it and why it is in place.
5% GST gives us £85 million in to the States pot. The GVA has reduced in the last 2 years y nearly £500 million and we need to make up this extra income. So until we come up with new and innovative solutions I believe it is here to stay but hopefully in the short term.
GST has many features that make it an attractive revenue-raising option for Jersey:
It is a more stable revenue source than many other taxes.
Substantial amounts of revenue are generated, even at relatively low tax rates.
It is fair, since it affects the broadest range of taxpayers - ensuring that those who benefit from public services also contribute to their funding. (Previously, about 25% of eligible taxpayers did not pay any tax in Jersey).
It is an efficient and relatively inexpensive tax to administer - with operating costs typically in the region of only 1% of the tax yield.
The compulsory issue of tax receipts and invoices provides an audit trail that makes the system less susceptible to fraud and evasion.
GST does not tax investments and savings. It encourages saving rather than spending and indirectly rewards enterprise and encourages economic resilience.
Since GST only applies to the domestic consumption of goods and services, the GST incurred in the process of producing exports can be identified and refunded, assisting exporters to be competitive in the world market.
Visitors to Jersey will contribute to the Island’s revenue.
7 Ministerial government is not working as well as it could. Ostensibly because only elements of the Clothier report were followed.
It this it needs an internal review.
8 Yes absolutely, a priority.
9 I would prefer career development for the local civil servants first.
10 I would not like to see ANY services being cut in the states.
11 Yes
St Helier 3&4
1 (a). Is it right that the number of Senators has been reduced, thus limiting
the choice for Islanders as a whole to choose their political leaders?
1 (b). If no, what would you seek to do about it?
2. The States Pension age is going to be progressively increased over the next few years. Would you support legislation preventing employers from compulsorily retiring people who have not yet qualified for their pension, to prevent them being left without any income other than such welfare as they may qualify for?
3 (a). Would you support measures to stabilise the population at current levels?
3 (b). If not, how do think Jersey can accommodate further population growth?
4. Who will have your support to be the next Chief Minister?
5. Would you like Jersey to move towards a more progressive tax system?
6. Do you think GST should be retained in its present form, abolished, reduced or increased?
7 (a). Is Ministerial Government working the way it was envisaged?
7 (b) If not, what would you do to remedy the situation?
8. With the long-term stagnation of the housing market, the private rental sector is once again growing in importance. Would you support an overhaul of tenancy law to strike a fairer balance of rights and duties between residents and landlords?
9. Do you have a view on whether the extensive importation of UK Civil Service managers on short contracts is beneficial, or whether ther should be more emphasis on career development for local civil servants?
10. Which, if any, public services would you like to see the States cutting?
11. Would you support increased Social Security contibutions, ring fenced to protect future pension & health benefits, but not as a way of raising income for the Treasury.
Ted Vibert St Helier 3/4
1.absolutely right. The islandwide mandate is meaningless when a person can ber elected with 270 votes and has the same power as someone with 14,000 votes
2. Absolutely
3.(a) Absolutely
3.(b) It can't
4. Myself or Ian le Marquand
5. Absolutely
6. Abolished eventually, reduced and taken off food and heating fuel
7.(a) Not at all
7.(b) Go back to Clothier and not cherry pick
8. Absolutely
9. Absolutely
10. Not services but departments. Economic Development is a layer of public servants on top of a layer of public servants.
11. Yes
the choice for Islanders as a whole to choose their political leaders?
1 (b). If no, what would you seek to do about it?
2. The States Pension age is going to be progressively increased over the next few years. Would you support legislation preventing employers from compulsorily retiring people who have not yet qualified for their pension, to prevent them being left without any income other than such welfare as they may qualify for?
3 (a). Would you support measures to stabilise the population at current levels?
3 (b). If not, how do think Jersey can accommodate further population growth?
4. Who will have your support to be the next Chief Minister?
5. Would you like Jersey to move towards a more progressive tax system?
6. Do you think GST should be retained in its present form, abolished, reduced or increased?
7 (a). Is Ministerial Government working the way it was envisaged?
7 (b) If not, what would you do to remedy the situation?
8. With the long-term stagnation of the housing market, the private rental sector is once again growing in importance. Would you support an overhaul of tenancy law to strike a fairer balance of rights and duties between residents and landlords?
9. Do you have a view on whether the extensive importation of UK Civil Service managers on short contracts is beneficial, or whether ther should be more emphasis on career development for local civil servants?
10. Which, if any, public services would you like to see the States cutting?
11. Would you support increased Social Security contibutions, ring fenced to protect future pension & health benefits, but not as a way of raising income for the Treasury.
Ted Vibert St Helier 3/4
1.absolutely right. The islandwide mandate is meaningless when a person can ber elected with 270 votes and has the same power as someone with 14,000 votes
2. Absolutely
3.(a) Absolutely
3.(b) It can't
4. Myself or Ian le Marquand
5. Absolutely
6. Abolished eventually, reduced and taken off food and heating fuel
7.(a) Not at all
7.(b) Go back to Clothier and not cherry pick
8. Absolutely
9. Absolutely
10. Not services but departments. Economic Development is a layer of public servants on top of a layer of public servants.
11. Yes
St Brelade
1 (a). Is it right that the number of Senators has been reduced, thus limiting
the choice for Islanders as a whole to choose their political leaders?
1 (b). If no, what would you seek to do about it?
2. The States Pension age is going to be progressively increased over the next few years. Would you support legislation preventing employers from compulsorily retiring people who have not yet qualified for their pension, to prevent them being left without any income other than such welfare as they may qualify for?
3 (a). Would you support measures to stabilise the population at current levels?
3 (b). If not, how do think Jersey can accommodate further population growth?
4. Who will have your support to be the next Chief Minister?
5. Would you like Jersey to move towards a more progressive tax system?
6. Do you think GST should be retained in its present form, abolished, reduced or increased?
7 (a). Is Ministerial Government working the way it was envisaged?
7 (b) If not, what would you do to remedy the situation?
8. With the long-term stagnation of the housing market, the private rental sector is once again growing in importance. Would you support an overhaul of tenancy law to strike a fairer balance of rights and duties between residents and landlords?
9. Do you have a view on whether the extensive importation of UK Civil Service managers on short contracts is beneficial, or whether there should be more emphasis on career development for local civil servants?
10. Which, if any, public services would you like to see the States cutting?
11. Would you support increased Social Security contributions, ring fenced to protect future pension & health benefits, but not as a way of raising income for the Treasury.
M.J. Le Masurier St Brelades No 2:-
1a It was not right to reduce the Senators in this fashion. I agree with a reduction of States members but it needs to be achieved as part of a full review of the structure of government.
1 b. The electoral commission is looking at this issue. Subject to outcomes, I would be in favour of a full review, similar to Clothier but seek the agreement of all members beforehand to live with the outcomes, no matter what is proposed.
2.Yes. I like the idea of offering pensioners the opportunity of returning to the workplace to contribute as 'coaches' for the younger generation and pass on their skills. Granted, this isn't for all pensioners.
3.a Very much so. I believe we have to improve the productivity levels across the workforce so that locals can take on more responsibility, reducing the need for additional people from off Island. Also, allow locals to progress to top positions via compulsory succession planning.
3.b. See above. We will always need some expertise from off Island but I think the numbers could be dramatically reduced.
4. Whoever shows me that they are a caring and progressive individual with charismatic leadership qualities. It is too early to tell.
5.I'm not sure 20/20 is the answer. Middle Jersey needs help in the form of exemptions as they bear the largest burden in terms of taxation and other costs. I'd welcome a review of the tax contribution of 1.1 K residents to ensure fairness is maintained across all sectors of the community.
6. I think GST is harming local residents and there should be exemptions from the essentials of life. Explore other ways of closing the zero/10 shortfall rather then via GST.
7.a. No it isn't. Power lies in too few hands. It has to change and quickly.
7.b See 1.b
8. Yes, that seems reasonable.
9. Much of my life has been spent in the field of training & development. The civil service is large enough and diverse enough as it is without bringing in people from outside the Island, except in rare circumstances. More flexibility is needed to enable the workforce to move between sectors where needed and comprehensive training & development opportunities and career planning should exist to help them make that transition. Also, good succession planning is a necessity
10. No essential services but a phased reduction in management levels as any responsible business would do. Freeze pay awards for a period for the highly paid. Look at ways to 'share' or amalgamate departments and services.
11. Yes, the concept has merit, but not right now.
Steve Pallett – Constable:-
1 (a). No.
1(b). The decision has been made and I do not want to waste more States time redebating the issue. I want to wait for the independent review into the composition of the States Assembly before moving forward. I do however think the final make-up of the Assembly should be decided by the public through a referendum.
2. Yes, I would support legislation preventing employers from compulsorily retiring people before pension age.
3. Yes, because of the poor state of the island's economy and the number of local people unemployed.
4. Senator Ian le Marquand.
5. Yes
6. retained in its present form. No further increases until States spending has been brought under control.
7.(a). No
7.(b). Too much power in the hands of too few individuals. Make government more inclusive by increasing those involved in decision making. Possibly having two Assistant Ministers per Minister, each with more responsibility.
8. Yes.
9.more emphasis on career development. Grooming successors for senior civil servant roles. Less reliance on the importation of senior managers and consultants.
10. An overall cut in the level of States expenditure. Reduce staffing levels at major departments through natural wastage rather than compulsory redundancies. A moratorium on employing new staff above say a salary level of £70,00 unless a proven need, or unavailable from another States Department.
11. No.
the choice for Islanders as a whole to choose their political leaders?
1 (b). If no, what would you seek to do about it?
2. The States Pension age is going to be progressively increased over the next few years. Would you support legislation preventing employers from compulsorily retiring people who have not yet qualified for their pension, to prevent them being left without any income other than such welfare as they may qualify for?
3 (a). Would you support measures to stabilise the population at current levels?
3 (b). If not, how do think Jersey can accommodate further population growth?
4. Who will have your support to be the next Chief Minister?
5. Would you like Jersey to move towards a more progressive tax system?
6. Do you think GST should be retained in its present form, abolished, reduced or increased?
7 (a). Is Ministerial Government working the way it was envisaged?
7 (b) If not, what would you do to remedy the situation?
8. With the long-term stagnation of the housing market, the private rental sector is once again growing in importance. Would you support an overhaul of tenancy law to strike a fairer balance of rights and duties between residents and landlords?
9. Do you have a view on whether the extensive importation of UK Civil Service managers on short contracts is beneficial, or whether there should be more emphasis on career development for local civil servants?
10. Which, if any, public services would you like to see the States cutting?
11. Would you support increased Social Security contributions, ring fenced to protect future pension & health benefits, but not as a way of raising income for the Treasury.
M.J. Le Masurier St Brelades No 2:-
1a It was not right to reduce the Senators in this fashion. I agree with a reduction of States members but it needs to be achieved as part of a full review of the structure of government.
1 b. The electoral commission is looking at this issue. Subject to outcomes, I would be in favour of a full review, similar to Clothier but seek the agreement of all members beforehand to live with the outcomes, no matter what is proposed.
2.Yes. I like the idea of offering pensioners the opportunity of returning to the workplace to contribute as 'coaches' for the younger generation and pass on their skills. Granted, this isn't for all pensioners.
3.a Very much so. I believe we have to improve the productivity levels across the workforce so that locals can take on more responsibility, reducing the need for additional people from off Island. Also, allow locals to progress to top positions via compulsory succession planning.
3.b. See above. We will always need some expertise from off Island but I think the numbers could be dramatically reduced.
4. Whoever shows me that they are a caring and progressive individual with charismatic leadership qualities. It is too early to tell.
5.I'm not sure 20/20 is the answer. Middle Jersey needs help in the form of exemptions as they bear the largest burden in terms of taxation and other costs. I'd welcome a review of the tax contribution of 1.1 K residents to ensure fairness is maintained across all sectors of the community.
6. I think GST is harming local residents and there should be exemptions from the essentials of life. Explore other ways of closing the zero/10 shortfall rather then via GST.
7.a. No it isn't. Power lies in too few hands. It has to change and quickly.
7.b See 1.b
8. Yes, that seems reasonable.
9. Much of my life has been spent in the field of training & development. The civil service is large enough and diverse enough as it is without bringing in people from outside the Island, except in rare circumstances. More flexibility is needed to enable the workforce to move between sectors where needed and comprehensive training & development opportunities and career planning should exist to help them make that transition. Also, good succession planning is a necessity
10. No essential services but a phased reduction in management levels as any responsible business would do. Freeze pay awards for a period for the highly paid. Look at ways to 'share' or amalgamate departments and services.
11. Yes, the concept has merit, but not right now.
Steve Pallett – Constable:-
1 (a). No.
1(b). The decision has been made and I do not want to waste more States time redebating the issue. I want to wait for the independent review into the composition of the States Assembly before moving forward. I do however think the final make-up of the Assembly should be decided by the public through a referendum.
2. Yes, I would support legislation preventing employers from compulsorily retiring people before pension age.
3. Yes, because of the poor state of the island's economy and the number of local people unemployed.
4. Senator Ian le Marquand.
5. Yes
6. retained in its present form. No further increases until States spending has been brought under control.
7.(a). No
7.(b). Too much power in the hands of too few individuals. Make government more inclusive by increasing those involved in decision making. Possibly having two Assistant Ministers per Minister, each with more responsibility.
8. Yes.
9.more emphasis on career development. Grooming successors for senior civil servant roles. Less reliance on the importation of senior managers and consultants.
10. An overall cut in the level of States expenditure. Reduce staffing levels at major departments through natural wastage rather than compulsory redundancies. A moratorium on employing new staff above say a salary level of £70,00 unless a proven need, or unavailable from another States Department.
11. No.
St Clement
1 (a). Is it right that the number of Senators has been reduced, thus limiting
the choice for Islanders as a whole to choose their political leaders?
1 (b). If no, what would you seek to do about it?
2. The States Pension age is going to be progressively increased over the next few years. Would you support legislation preventing employers from compulsorily retiring people who have not yet qualified for their pension, to prevent them being left without any income other than such welfare as they may qualify for?
3 (a). Would you support measures to stabilise the population at current levels?
3 (b). If not, how do think Jersey can accommodate further population growth?
4. Who will have your support to be the next Chief Minister?
5. Would you like Jersey to move towards a more progressive tax system?
6. Do you think GST should be retained in its present form, abolished, reduced or increased?
7 (a). Is Ministerial Government working the way it was envisaged?
7 (b) If not, what would you do to remedy the situation?
8. With the long-term stagnation of the housing market, the private rental sector is once again growing in importance. Would you support an overhaul of tenancy law to strike a fairer balance of rights and duties between residents and landlords?
9. Do you have a view on whether the extensive importation of UK Civil Service managers on short contracts is beneficial, or whether there should be more emphasis on career development for local civil servants?
10. Which, if any, public services would you like to see the States cutting?
Would you support increased Social Security contributions, ring fenced to protect future pension & health benefits, but not as a way of raising income for the Treasury.
David Cabeldu - St Clement:-
1. (a). no, but see 1B
1.(b). Completely overhaul the makeup of the States via input to States Reform Commission. Reduction in OVERALL numbers being one move
2. Ideally, Yes, although a blanket legislation may be counter-productive, as employers may lower their sights on taking on older employees.
3. (a). Yes
4. if he declares, Senator Alan Breckon
5. Yes
6. Frozen
7. (a). No
7. (b). (See Q 1B) States Reform via independent commission
8. The current tenancy agreements seem to be fair. I would suggest that only the question of deposits is an issue
9. We should look at our existing talent base and use that before the culture of 'UK is Best' Succession and training is key
10. Not education or health (the reverse). Cuts in bureaucracy & procurement would save more in the first instance before public spending cuts should happen
11. A good idea, but I would like to see an in-depth report
________________________________________________________________________________
Gerard Baudins St Clement:-
1.(a). A retrograde step
1.(b). Increase island-wide representation
2. Yes
3.(a). Yes
3.(b). N/A
4.Sen A.Maclean (if he stands) otherwise I. Gorst (if he gets in)
5. Yes
6. abolished
7.(a). Ministerial Government not working.
7.(b). N/A
8. Believe the balance is about right.
9. The latter.
10. The unnecessary ones eg Water Resources Law
11. Yes, but not if large
the choice for Islanders as a whole to choose their political leaders?
1 (b). If no, what would you seek to do about it?
2. The States Pension age is going to be progressively increased over the next few years. Would you support legislation preventing employers from compulsorily retiring people who have not yet qualified for their pension, to prevent them being left without any income other than such welfare as they may qualify for?
3 (a). Would you support measures to stabilise the population at current levels?
3 (b). If not, how do think Jersey can accommodate further population growth?
4. Who will have your support to be the next Chief Minister?
5. Would you like Jersey to move towards a more progressive tax system?
6. Do you think GST should be retained in its present form, abolished, reduced or increased?
7 (a). Is Ministerial Government working the way it was envisaged?
7 (b) If not, what would you do to remedy the situation?
8. With the long-term stagnation of the housing market, the private rental sector is once again growing in importance. Would you support an overhaul of tenancy law to strike a fairer balance of rights and duties between residents and landlords?
9. Do you have a view on whether the extensive importation of UK Civil Service managers on short contracts is beneficial, or whether there should be more emphasis on career development for local civil servants?
10. Which, if any, public services would you like to see the States cutting?
Would you support increased Social Security contributions, ring fenced to protect future pension & health benefits, but not as a way of raising income for the Treasury.
David Cabeldu - St Clement:-
1. (a). no, but see 1B
1.(b). Completely overhaul the makeup of the States via input to States Reform Commission. Reduction in OVERALL numbers being one move
2. Ideally, Yes, although a blanket legislation may be counter-productive, as employers may lower their sights on taking on older employees.
3. (a). Yes
4. if he declares, Senator Alan Breckon
5. Yes
6. Frozen
7. (a). No
7. (b). (See Q 1B) States Reform via independent commission
8. The current tenancy agreements seem to be fair. I would suggest that only the question of deposits is an issue
9. We should look at our existing talent base and use that before the culture of 'UK is Best' Succession and training is key
10. Not education or health (the reverse). Cuts in bureaucracy & procurement would save more in the first instance before public spending cuts should happen
11. A good idea, but I would like to see an in-depth report
________________________________________________________________________________
Gerard Baudins St Clement:-
1.(a). A retrograde step
1.(b). Increase island-wide representation
2. Yes
3.(a). Yes
3.(b). N/A
4.Sen A.Maclean (if he stands) otherwise I. Gorst (if he gets in)
5. Yes
6. abolished
7.(a). Ministerial Government not working.
7.(b). N/A
8. Believe the balance is about right.
9. The latter.
10. The unnecessary ones eg Water Resources Law
11. Yes, but not if large
Grouville
9. Do you have a view on whether the extensive importation of UK Civil Service managers on short contracts is beneficial, or whether ther should be more emphasis on career development for local civil servants?
10. Which, if any, public services would you like to see the States cutting?
11. Would you support increased Social Security contibutions, ring fenced to protect future pension & health benefits, but not as a way of raising income for the Treasury.
1 (a). Is it right that the number of Senators has been reduced, thus limiting
the choice for Islanders as a whole to choose their political leaders?
1 (b). If no, what would you seek to do about it?
2. The States Pension age is going to be progressively increased over the next few years. Would you support legislation preventing employers from compulsorily retiring people who have not yet qualified for their pension, to prevent them being left without any income other than such welfare as they may qualify for?
3 (a). Would you support measures to stabilise the population at current levels?
3 (b). If not, how do think Jersey can accommodate further population growth?
4. Who will have your support to be the next Chief Minister?
5. Would you like Jersey to move towards a more progressive tax system?
6. Do you think GST should be retained in its present form, abolished, reduced or increased?
7 (a). Is Ministerial Government working the way it was envisaged?
7 (b) If not, what would you do to remedy the situation?
8. With the long-term stagnation of the housing market, the private rental sector is once again growing in importance. Would you support an overhaul of tenancy law to strike a fairer balance of rights and duties between residents and landlords?
9. Do you have a view on whether the extensive importation of UK Civil Service managers on short contracts is beneficial, or whether there should be more emphasis on career development for local civil servants?
10. Which, if any, public services would you like to see the States cutting?
11. Would you support increased Social Security contributions, ring fenced to protect future pension & health benefits, but not as a way of raising income for the Treasury.
Dear Mr Rotherham,
Thank you for your undated letter that I received on October 3rd . I hope you understand that my priority in this busy election period is to reach out and respond to my 3400 voters in the Parish I hope to represent as Deputy. I will therefore not be answering your questionnaire in detail. Most of the issues are however covered in my very detailed website www.dominicjones.je. I have also responded to a similar questionnaire that is to be published by the JEP before elections.
You raise some important issues and I share what I perceive is your concern that many candidates have not provided sufficient detail in their election material to enable voters to understand what policies they may support if elected. I hope that I have however given voters plenty of information on my website and in my manifesto to enable them to make an informed decision.
Yours sincerely,
Dominic Jones
Candidate for Deputy of Grouville
10. Which, if any, public services would you like to see the States cutting?
11. Would you support increased Social Security contibutions, ring fenced to protect future pension & health benefits, but not as a way of raising income for the Treasury.
1 (a). Is it right that the number of Senators has been reduced, thus limiting
the choice for Islanders as a whole to choose their political leaders?
1 (b). If no, what would you seek to do about it?
2. The States Pension age is going to be progressively increased over the next few years. Would you support legislation preventing employers from compulsorily retiring people who have not yet qualified for their pension, to prevent them being left without any income other than such welfare as they may qualify for?
3 (a). Would you support measures to stabilise the population at current levels?
3 (b). If not, how do think Jersey can accommodate further population growth?
4. Who will have your support to be the next Chief Minister?
5. Would you like Jersey to move towards a more progressive tax system?
6. Do you think GST should be retained in its present form, abolished, reduced or increased?
7 (a). Is Ministerial Government working the way it was envisaged?
7 (b) If not, what would you do to remedy the situation?
8. With the long-term stagnation of the housing market, the private rental sector is once again growing in importance. Would you support an overhaul of tenancy law to strike a fairer balance of rights and duties between residents and landlords?
9. Do you have a view on whether the extensive importation of UK Civil Service managers on short contracts is beneficial, or whether there should be more emphasis on career development for local civil servants?
10. Which, if any, public services would you like to see the States cutting?
11. Would you support increased Social Security contributions, ring fenced to protect future pension & health benefits, but not as a way of raising income for the Treasury.
Dear Mr Rotherham,
Thank you for your undated letter that I received on October 3rd . I hope you understand that my priority in this busy election period is to reach out and respond to my 3400 voters in the Parish I hope to represent as Deputy. I will therefore not be answering your questionnaire in detail. Most of the issues are however covered in my very detailed website www.dominicjones.je. I have also responded to a similar questionnaire that is to be published by the JEP before elections.
You raise some important issues and I share what I perceive is your concern that many candidates have not provided sufficient detail in their election material to enable voters to understand what policies they may support if elected. I hope that I have however given voters plenty of information on my website and in my manifesto to enable them to make an informed decision.
Yours sincerely,
Dominic Jones
Candidate for Deputy of Grouville
St John
1 (a). Is it right that the number of Senators has been reduced, thus limiting
the choice for Islanders as a whole to choose their political leaders?
1 (b). If no, what would you seek to do about it?
2. The States Pension age is going to be progressively increased over the next few years. Would you support legislation preventing employers from compulsorily retiring people who have not yet qualified for their pension, to prevent them being left without any income other than such welfare as they may qualify for?
3 (a). Would you support measures to stabilise the population at current levels?
3 (b). If not, how do think Jersey can accommodate further population growth?
4. Who will have your support to be the next Chief Minister?
5. Would you like Jersey to move towards a more progressive tax system?
6. Do you think GST should be retained in its present form, abolished, reduced or increased?
7 (a). Is Ministerial Government working the way it was envisaged?
7 (b) If not, what would you do to remedy the situation?
8. With the long-term stagnation of the housing market, the private rental sector is once again growing in importance. Would you support an overhaul of tenancy law to strike a fairer balance of rights and duties between residents and landlords?
9. Do you have a view on whether the extensive importation of UK Civil Service managers on short contracts is beneficial, or whether there should be more emphasis on career development for local civil servants?
10. Which, if any, public services would you like to see the States cutting?
11. Would you support increased Social Security contributions, ring fenced to protect future pension & health benefits, but not as a way of raising income for the Treasury.
Patrick Ryan:-
1.(a). No
1.(b). Consult with public - General Election and 12 senator all-island mandate are mutually exclusive. Which one more important?
2.Yes
3.(a). Yes - but current level is about 100ks.
4.Ian le Marquand or Ian Gorst - not sure yet, but ne objection to publicising voting.
5. Yes.
6. Both abolished and increased: Taken off food and consider luxury rate.
7.(a). No - most scrutiny ineffective.
7.(b). Reduce members by about 10, increase pay for those with more responsibility, including Scrutiny, reduce pay for those without responsibility and in this way improve calibre of members. When calibre of members better, you will get much better Scrutiny.
8. Yes.
9. Latter for sure!
10. Full review of services, but frontline Health, Education and Police should not be cut.
11.Yes.
David Ward:-
David Ward:-
1. (a). No
1. (b). --
2.Yes
3(a). Yes.
3.(b). --
4. Until ALL candidates have declared it is difficult to say.
5.No. But all taxes should be collected, especially from seasonal/part time employed.
6. Retained in present form.
7. (a). NO
7. (b). The system needs to be assessed and revised. Possibly allowing the Chief Minister to select his own cabinet.
8. Sorry I don't know enough about the present statutes to comment.
9. There should be much more emphasis on local talent and training. GB is not a sparking example of local gov't.
10. Reduction of all middle managers across the States.
11. YES.
Andrew Lewis:-
Dear Mr Rotherham
Thank you for your letter and the interest that the JRA express in the forthcoming elections.
The candidates have all been invited to complete a questionnaire by the JEP that will no doubt be published in the near future. I am not therefore minded to answer another set of questions but would respectfully ask that you refer to my website www.andrewlewis.info to learn of my policies and opinions on a number of local issues.
With kind regards
Andrew Lewis
PS I am returning your SAE so that you can make use of it for another mailing.
PLEASE VOTE ANDREW LEWIS FOR DEPUTY ON 19TH OCTOBER
the choice for Islanders as a whole to choose their political leaders?
1 (b). If no, what would you seek to do about it?
2. The States Pension age is going to be progressively increased over the next few years. Would you support legislation preventing employers from compulsorily retiring people who have not yet qualified for their pension, to prevent them being left without any income other than such welfare as they may qualify for?
3 (a). Would you support measures to stabilise the population at current levels?
3 (b). If not, how do think Jersey can accommodate further population growth?
4. Who will have your support to be the next Chief Minister?
5. Would you like Jersey to move towards a more progressive tax system?
6. Do you think GST should be retained in its present form, abolished, reduced or increased?
7 (a). Is Ministerial Government working the way it was envisaged?
7 (b) If not, what would you do to remedy the situation?
8. With the long-term stagnation of the housing market, the private rental sector is once again growing in importance. Would you support an overhaul of tenancy law to strike a fairer balance of rights and duties between residents and landlords?
9. Do you have a view on whether the extensive importation of UK Civil Service managers on short contracts is beneficial, or whether there should be more emphasis on career development for local civil servants?
10. Which, if any, public services would you like to see the States cutting?
11. Would you support increased Social Security contributions, ring fenced to protect future pension & health benefits, but not as a way of raising income for the Treasury.
Patrick Ryan:-
1.(a). No
1.(b). Consult with public - General Election and 12 senator all-island mandate are mutually exclusive. Which one more important?
2.Yes
3.(a). Yes - but current level is about 100ks.
4.Ian le Marquand or Ian Gorst - not sure yet, but ne objection to publicising voting.
5. Yes.
6. Both abolished and increased: Taken off food and consider luxury rate.
7.(a). No - most scrutiny ineffective.
7.(b). Reduce members by about 10, increase pay for those with more responsibility, including Scrutiny, reduce pay for those without responsibility and in this way improve calibre of members. When calibre of members better, you will get much better Scrutiny.
8. Yes.
9. Latter for sure!
10. Full review of services, but frontline Health, Education and Police should not be cut.
11.Yes.
David Ward:-
David Ward:-
1. (a). No
1. (b). --
2.Yes
3(a). Yes.
3.(b). --
4. Until ALL candidates have declared it is difficult to say.
5.No. But all taxes should be collected, especially from seasonal/part time employed.
6. Retained in present form.
7. (a). NO
7. (b). The system needs to be assessed and revised. Possibly allowing the Chief Minister to select his own cabinet.
8. Sorry I don't know enough about the present statutes to comment.
9. There should be much more emphasis on local talent and training. GB is not a sparking example of local gov't.
10. Reduction of all middle managers across the States.
11. YES.
Andrew Lewis:-
Dear Mr Rotherham
Thank you for your letter and the interest that the JRA express in the forthcoming elections.
The candidates have all been invited to complete a questionnaire by the JEP that will no doubt be published in the near future. I am not therefore minded to answer another set of questions but would respectfully ask that you refer to my website www.andrewlewis.info to learn of my policies and opinions on a number of local issues.
With kind regards
Andrew Lewis
PS I am returning your SAE so that you can make use of it for another mailing.
PLEASE VOTE ANDREW LEWIS FOR DEPUTY ON 19TH OCTOBER
St Martin
1 (a). Is it right that the number of Senators has been reduced, thus limiting
the choice for Islanders as a whole to choose their political leaders?
1 (b). If no, what would you seek to do about it?
2. The States Pension age is going to be progressively increased over the next few years. Would you support legislation preventing employers from compulsorily retiring people who have not yet qualified for their pension, to prevent them being left without any income other than such welfare as they may qualify for?
3 (a). Would you support measures to stabilise the population at current levels?
3 (b). If not, how do think Jersey can accommodate further population growth?
4. Who will have your support to be the next Chief Minister?
5. Would you like Jersey to move towards a more progressive tax system?
6. Do you think GST should be retained in its present form, abolished, reduced or increased?
7 (a). Is Ministerial Government working the way it was envisaged?
7 (b) If not, what would you do to remedy the situation?
8. With the long-term stagnation of the housing market, the private rental sector is once again growing in importance. Would you support an overhaul of tenancy law to strike a fairer balance of rights and duties between residents and landlords?
9. Do you have a view on whether the extensive importation of UK Civil Service managers on short contracts is beneficial, or whether there should be more emphasis on career development for local civil servants?
10. Which, if any, public services would you like to see the States cutting?
11. Would you support increased Social Security contributions, ring fenced to protect future pension & health benefits, but not as a way of raising income for the Treasury.
Bob Hill:-
1 (a) I am happy to reduce the number of Senators, particularly as so few are Ministers.
2 Yes
3 Yes
4 Am not happy to support Routier, Ozouf nor Le Marquand, not just because they voted against the open vote for Ch Minister but I don't think they can lead and their overall performance during the past 3 years has not been inspired. I would give my support to Gorst or Crowcroft if they were interested.
5 Yes, we must look to a fairer system with larger earners making a greater contribution to tax revenue.
6 We have made a pig's ear re GST and completely missed the boat when rejecting Len Norman's proposition for exemption on all food for human consumption. We are now locked into a system based of income support which will be difficult to opt out. It is also obvious that GIST will eventually rise as that has been the pattern elsewhere in the world. I would welcome a complete re-think before any consideration is given to an increase.
7 No, we have elected a Chief Minister who did not have any leadership skills who appointed Ministers based on their loyalty than ability.
7(b) Appoint a Chief Minister with leadership skills who will nominate the best persons for the job. Scrap the Troy ruling as it is pointless. Minister's must appoint the most talented Members as Assistant Ministers and all Ministers must utilise the talents and experience of those who are not on the Executive. I would also scrap Scrutiny as it is not working and replace with select committee style format.
8 Yes
9 The present policy is a complete disaster and working against the best interests of locals. Again strong leadership is required.
10 A very difficult question as there has has been a gradual reduction of staff, however greater attention should be given to duplication and waste of resources.
11 Yes
the choice for Islanders as a whole to choose their political leaders?
1 (b). If no, what would you seek to do about it?
2. The States Pension age is going to be progressively increased over the next few years. Would you support legislation preventing employers from compulsorily retiring people who have not yet qualified for their pension, to prevent them being left without any income other than such welfare as they may qualify for?
3 (a). Would you support measures to stabilise the population at current levels?
3 (b). If not, how do think Jersey can accommodate further population growth?
4. Who will have your support to be the next Chief Minister?
5. Would you like Jersey to move towards a more progressive tax system?
6. Do you think GST should be retained in its present form, abolished, reduced or increased?
7 (a). Is Ministerial Government working the way it was envisaged?
7 (b) If not, what would you do to remedy the situation?
8. With the long-term stagnation of the housing market, the private rental sector is once again growing in importance. Would you support an overhaul of tenancy law to strike a fairer balance of rights and duties between residents and landlords?
9. Do you have a view on whether the extensive importation of UK Civil Service managers on short contracts is beneficial, or whether there should be more emphasis on career development for local civil servants?
10. Which, if any, public services would you like to see the States cutting?
11. Would you support increased Social Security contributions, ring fenced to protect future pension & health benefits, but not as a way of raising income for the Treasury.
Bob Hill:-
1 (a) I am happy to reduce the number of Senators, particularly as so few are Ministers.
2 Yes
3 Yes
4 Am not happy to support Routier, Ozouf nor Le Marquand, not just because they voted against the open vote for Ch Minister but I don't think they can lead and their overall performance during the past 3 years has not been inspired. I would give my support to Gorst or Crowcroft if they were interested.
5 Yes, we must look to a fairer system with larger earners making a greater contribution to tax revenue.
6 We have made a pig's ear re GST and completely missed the boat when rejecting Len Norman's proposition for exemption on all food for human consumption. We are now locked into a system based of income support which will be difficult to opt out. It is also obvious that GIST will eventually rise as that has been the pattern elsewhere in the world. I would welcome a complete re-think before any consideration is given to an increase.
7 No, we have elected a Chief Minister who did not have any leadership skills who appointed Ministers based on their loyalty than ability.
7(b) Appoint a Chief Minister with leadership skills who will nominate the best persons for the job. Scrap the Troy ruling as it is pointless. Minister's must appoint the most talented Members as Assistant Ministers and all Ministers must utilise the talents and experience of those who are not on the Executive. I would also scrap Scrutiny as it is not working and replace with select committee style format.
8 Yes
9 The present policy is a complete disaster and working against the best interests of locals. Again strong leadership is required.
10 A very difficult question as there has has been a gradual reduction of staff, however greater attention should be given to duplication and waste of resources.
11 Yes
St Ouen
1 (a). Is it right that the number of Senators has been reduced, thus limiting
the choice for Islanders as a whole to choose their political leaders?
1 (b). If no, what would you seek to do about it?
2. The States Pension age is going to be progressively increased over the next few years. Would you support legislation preventing employers from compulsorily retiring people who have not yet qualified for their pension, to prevent them being left without any income other than such welfare as they may qualify for?
3 (a). Would you support measures to stabilise the population at current levels?
3 (b). If not, how do think Jersey can accommodate further population growth?
4. Who will have your support to be the next Chief Minister?
5. Would you like Jersey to move towards a more progressive tax system?
6. Do you think GST should be retained in its present form, abolished, reduced or increased?
7 (a). Is Ministerial Government working the way it was envisaged?
7 (b) If not, what would you do to remedy the situation?
8. With the long-term stagnation of the housing market, the private rental sector is once again growing in importance. Would you support an overhaul of tenancy law to strike a fairer balance of rights and duties between residents and landlords?
9. Do you have a view on whether the extensive importation of UK Civil Service managers on short contracts is beneficial, or whether there should be more emphasis on career development for local civil servants?
10. Which, if any, public services would you like to see the States cutting?
11. Would you support increased Social Security contributions, ring fenced to protect future pension & health benefits, but not as a way of raising income for the Treasury.
Cliff le Clercq – St Ouen:-
1.I do not believe it's right....it should be rescinded.... based on fairness and the citizens need for meaningful representation
2.Yes workers are a vital part of our community and should not be disadvantaged
3.Yes...though not a complete closing of the door as we will need some people
4.We do not know who is available or willing yet
5.Yes
6.No
7a No
7b Look seriously at reform
8 Yes
9.More emphasis on career development for those living here ..Succession planning has been neglected...
10 The services in and of themselves benefit the community...however management spending and staffing levels need reviewing.
11..Ringfenced to prevent raiding
the choice for Islanders as a whole to choose their political leaders?
1 (b). If no, what would you seek to do about it?
2. The States Pension age is going to be progressively increased over the next few years. Would you support legislation preventing employers from compulsorily retiring people who have not yet qualified for their pension, to prevent them being left without any income other than such welfare as they may qualify for?
3 (a). Would you support measures to stabilise the population at current levels?
3 (b). If not, how do think Jersey can accommodate further population growth?
4. Who will have your support to be the next Chief Minister?
5. Would you like Jersey to move towards a more progressive tax system?
6. Do you think GST should be retained in its present form, abolished, reduced or increased?
7 (a). Is Ministerial Government working the way it was envisaged?
7 (b) If not, what would you do to remedy the situation?
8. With the long-term stagnation of the housing market, the private rental sector is once again growing in importance. Would you support an overhaul of tenancy law to strike a fairer balance of rights and duties between residents and landlords?
9. Do you have a view on whether the extensive importation of UK Civil Service managers on short contracts is beneficial, or whether there should be more emphasis on career development for local civil servants?
10. Which, if any, public services would you like to see the States cutting?
11. Would you support increased Social Security contributions, ring fenced to protect future pension & health benefits, but not as a way of raising income for the Treasury.
Cliff le Clercq – St Ouen:-
1.I do not believe it's right....it should be rescinded.... based on fairness and the citizens need for meaningful representation
2.Yes workers are a vital part of our community and should not be disadvantaged
3.Yes...though not a complete closing of the door as we will need some people
4.We do not know who is available or willing yet
5.Yes
6.No
7a No
7b Look seriously at reform
8 Yes
9.More emphasis on career development for those living here ..Succession planning has been neglected...
10 The services in and of themselves benefit the community...however management spending and staffing levels need reviewing.
11..Ringfenced to prevent raiding
St Peter
1 (a). Is it right that the number of Senators has been reduced, thus limiting
the choice for Islanders as a whole to choose their political leaders?
1 (b). If no, what would you seek to do about it?
2. The States Pension age is going to be progressively increased over the next few years. Would you support legislation preventing employers from compulsorily retiring people who have not yet qualified for their pension, to prevent them being left without any income other than such welfare as they may qualify for?
3 (a). Would you support measures to stabilise the population at current levels?
3 (b). If not, how do think Jersey can accommodate further population growth?
4. Who will have your support to be the next Chief Minister?
5. Would you like Jersey to move towards a more progressive tax system?
6. Do you think GST should be retained in its present form, abolished, reduced or increased?
7 (a). Is Ministerial Government working the way it was envisaged?
7 (b) If not, what would you do to remedy the situation?
8. With the long-term stagnation of the housing market, the private rental sector is once again growing in importance. Would you support an overhaul of tenancy law to strike a fairer balance of rights and duties between residents and landlords?
9. Do you have a view on whether the extensive importation of UK Civil Service managers on short contracts is beneficial, or whether there should be more emphasis on career development for local civil servants?
10. Which, if any, public services would you like to see the States cutting?
11. Would you support increased Social Security contributions, ring fenced to protect future pension & health benefits, but not as a way of raising income for the Treasury.
Wayne P le Marquand:-
1(a) No.
1(b) I would not have the constables in the states, they should remain in the parish. I would use the deputies to represent the parishes in the states.
2 No.
3(a) Definitely yes.
3(b) Can’t.
4 I do not feel it appropriate to say until after the elections.
5 I believe all companies should pay 1% not zero in the zero to ten system.
6 It should be abolished and subsidised by 1% company tax.
7(a) No.
7(b) Return to elected committee system majority decision to be ratified by ministers, scrap toothless scrutiny.
8 Yes.
9 Use local expertise.
10 Using up annual budgets.
11 Yes.
the choice for Islanders as a whole to choose their political leaders?
1 (b). If no, what would you seek to do about it?
2. The States Pension age is going to be progressively increased over the next few years. Would you support legislation preventing employers from compulsorily retiring people who have not yet qualified for their pension, to prevent them being left without any income other than such welfare as they may qualify for?
3 (a). Would you support measures to stabilise the population at current levels?
3 (b). If not, how do think Jersey can accommodate further population growth?
4. Who will have your support to be the next Chief Minister?
5. Would you like Jersey to move towards a more progressive tax system?
6. Do you think GST should be retained in its present form, abolished, reduced or increased?
7 (a). Is Ministerial Government working the way it was envisaged?
7 (b) If not, what would you do to remedy the situation?
8. With the long-term stagnation of the housing market, the private rental sector is once again growing in importance. Would you support an overhaul of tenancy law to strike a fairer balance of rights and duties between residents and landlords?
9. Do you have a view on whether the extensive importation of UK Civil Service managers on short contracts is beneficial, or whether there should be more emphasis on career development for local civil servants?
10. Which, if any, public services would you like to see the States cutting?
11. Would you support increased Social Security contributions, ring fenced to protect future pension & health benefits, but not as a way of raising income for the Treasury.
Wayne P le Marquand:-
1(a) No.
1(b) I would not have the constables in the states, they should remain in the parish. I would use the deputies to represent the parishes in the states.
2 No.
3(a) Definitely yes.
3(b) Can’t.
4 I do not feel it appropriate to say until after the elections.
5 I believe all companies should pay 1% not zero in the zero to ten system.
6 It should be abolished and subsidised by 1% company tax.
7(a) No.
7(b) Return to elected committee system majority decision to be ratified by ministers, scrap toothless scrutiny.
8 Yes.
9 Use local expertise.
10 Using up annual budgets.
11 Yes.
St Saviour
1 (a). Is it right that the number of Senators has been reduced, thus limiting
the choice for Islanders as a whole to choose their political leaders?
1 (b). If no, what would you seek to do about it?
2. The States Pension age is going to be progressively increased over the next few years. Would you support legislation preventing employers from compulsorily retiring people who have not yet qualified for their pension, to prevent them being left without any income other than such welfare as they may qualify for?
3 (a). Would you support measures to stabilise the population at current levels?
3 (b). If not, how do think Jersey can accommodate further population growth?
4. Who will have your support to be the next Chief Minister?
5. Would you like Jersey to move towards a more progressive tax system?
6. Do you think GST should be retained in its present form, abolished, reduced or increased?
7 (a). Is Ministerial Government working the way it was envisaged?
7 (b) If not, what would you do to remedy the situation?
8. With the long-term stagnation of the housing market, the private rental sector is once again growing in importance. Would you support an overhaul of tenancy law to strike a fairer balance of rights and duties between residents and landlords?
9. Do you have a view on whether the extensive importation of UK Civil Service managers on short contracts is beneficial, or whether there should be more emphasis on career development for local civil servants?
10. Which, if any, public services would you like to see the States cutting?
11. Would you support increased Social Security contributions, ring fenced to protect future pension & health benefits, but not as a way of raising income for the Treasury.
Shelley Rose St Saviour 2:-
1. (a). No
1.(b). Reduce number of Deputies, remove Constables & make island mandate for all
2. Definitely!
3. (a). Absolutely - we need work permits immediately & stricter housing control.
3.(b). It cannot.
4. Totally depends on who puts themselves forward and what their manifesto would be - I would support people like Alan Breckon, Roy le Herrissier or Ted Vibert if they get elected/re-elected and put themselves forward.
5. Yes we need a graduated tax system. The rich should pay more.
6. Abolished on food and domestic fuel - the rest maintained at 5% permanently if it's not removed altogether.
7.(a) No!
7. (b). Adoption of all Clothier Report recommendations
8. Definitely. Absolutely and immediately!
9. We should raise up our own civil servants and absolutely slash top wages forthwith.
10. None!
11. Possibly if no other alternative, but not by much - we can generate revenue through graduated tax system being introduced.
Footnote: Dear Mr Rotherham
I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your work on this questionnaire.
I am strongly of the opinion that the everyday residents' rights and plight are just never taken into account by successive governments and I applaud the JRA's consistent efforts to address serious issues on Islanders' behalf. Be always assured of my support
________________________________________________________________________________
Roy le Herissier St Saviour 3:-
Obviously it is hard to summarise complex issues, but here goes.
1.The reduction in senators' numbers was a prelude to fundamental reform, as the office could become untenable with the move (also in the Law) to a single period of office (4 years). I want a move to larger constituencies and a single type of member. It's crazy that one office is "more democratic" than others.
2. Would support lifting of compulsory retirement.
3. Yes, but population control is not a precise science!
4.A person who will promote inclusive government.
5. Yes
6. Exemptions must be re-visited.
7. (a). No.
7. (b). More inclusivity.
8. Yes.
9. much more emphasis on succession planning.
10. i don't want cutting for cutting's sake. I would expect proper efficiency reviews.
11. Yes, Soc. sec. should remain hypothecated, but it depends on how/whether we can reform broader tax system.
the choice for Islanders as a whole to choose their political leaders?
1 (b). If no, what would you seek to do about it?
2. The States Pension age is going to be progressively increased over the next few years. Would you support legislation preventing employers from compulsorily retiring people who have not yet qualified for their pension, to prevent them being left without any income other than such welfare as they may qualify for?
3 (a). Would you support measures to stabilise the population at current levels?
3 (b). If not, how do think Jersey can accommodate further population growth?
4. Who will have your support to be the next Chief Minister?
5. Would you like Jersey to move towards a more progressive tax system?
6. Do you think GST should be retained in its present form, abolished, reduced or increased?
7 (a). Is Ministerial Government working the way it was envisaged?
7 (b) If not, what would you do to remedy the situation?
8. With the long-term stagnation of the housing market, the private rental sector is once again growing in importance. Would you support an overhaul of tenancy law to strike a fairer balance of rights and duties between residents and landlords?
9. Do you have a view on whether the extensive importation of UK Civil Service managers on short contracts is beneficial, or whether there should be more emphasis on career development for local civil servants?
10. Which, if any, public services would you like to see the States cutting?
11. Would you support increased Social Security contributions, ring fenced to protect future pension & health benefits, but not as a way of raising income for the Treasury.
Shelley Rose St Saviour 2:-
1. (a). No
1.(b). Reduce number of Deputies, remove Constables & make island mandate for all
2. Definitely!
3. (a). Absolutely - we need work permits immediately & stricter housing control.
3.(b). It cannot.
4. Totally depends on who puts themselves forward and what their manifesto would be - I would support people like Alan Breckon, Roy le Herrissier or Ted Vibert if they get elected/re-elected and put themselves forward.
5. Yes we need a graduated tax system. The rich should pay more.
6. Abolished on food and domestic fuel - the rest maintained at 5% permanently if it's not removed altogether.
7.(a) No!
7. (b). Adoption of all Clothier Report recommendations
8. Definitely. Absolutely and immediately!
9. We should raise up our own civil servants and absolutely slash top wages forthwith.
10. None!
11. Possibly if no other alternative, but not by much - we can generate revenue through graduated tax system being introduced.
Footnote: Dear Mr Rotherham
I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your work on this questionnaire.
I am strongly of the opinion that the everyday residents' rights and plight are just never taken into account by successive governments and I applaud the JRA's consistent efforts to address serious issues on Islanders' behalf. Be always assured of my support
________________________________________________________________________________
Roy le Herissier St Saviour 3:-
Obviously it is hard to summarise complex issues, but here goes.
1.The reduction in senators' numbers was a prelude to fundamental reform, as the office could become untenable with the move (also in the Law) to a single period of office (4 years). I want a move to larger constituencies and a single type of member. It's crazy that one office is "more democratic" than others.
2. Would support lifting of compulsory retirement.
3. Yes, but population control is not a precise science!
4.A person who will promote inclusive government.
5. Yes
6. Exemptions must be re-visited.
7. (a). No.
7. (b). More inclusivity.
8. Yes.
9. much more emphasis on succession planning.
10. i don't want cutting for cutting's sake. I would expect proper efficiency reviews.
11. Yes, Soc. sec. should remain hypothecated, but it depends on how/whether we can reform broader tax system.
General Election 2011 - Senators - New Candidates
1 (a). Is it right that the number of Senators has been reduced, thus limiting
the choice for Islanders as a whole to choose their political leaders?
1 (b). If no, what would you seek to do about it?
2. The States Pension age is going to be progressively increased over the next few years. Would you support legislation preventing employers from compulsorily retiring people who have not yet qualified for their pension, to prevent them being left without any income other than such welfare as they may qualify for?
3 (a). Would you support measures to stabilise the population at current levels?
3 (b). If not, how do think Jersey can accommodate further population growth?
4. Who will have your support to be the next Chief Minister?
5. Would you like Jersey to move towards a more progressive tax system?
6. Do you think GST should be retained in its present form, abolished, reduced or increased?
7 (a). Is Ministerial Government working the way it was envisaged?
7 (b) If not, what would you do to remedy the situation?
8. With the long-term stagnation of the housing market, the private rental sector is once again growing in importance. Would you support an overhaul of tenancy law to strike a fairer balance of rights and duties between residents and landlords?
9. Do you have a view on whether the extensive importation of UK Civil Service managers on short contracts is beneficial, or whether there should be more emphasis on career development for local civil servants?
10. Which, if any, public services would you like to see the States cutting?
11. Would you support increased Social Security contributions, ring fenced to protect future pension & health benefits, but not as a way of raising income for the Treasury.
_______________________________________________________________________________
Darius Pearce:-
1. It is largely irrelevant the composition and number of States members. What is important that the States chamber works effectively. Whilst people have suggested political parties, I do not believe there is sufficient difference in opinion in Jersey to justify parties. However that removes the link between the wishes of the people and the people in the legislature which would be served by parties (through policy decision which are made at party conferences). The lack of this interaction between the public and the people in the chamber is I believe the root of all Jersey's problems and I would therefore address this by undertaking public surveys of every decision and bringing the results to each debate so the will of the people is clearly evidenced in every debate. David Cameron votes along party lines and not according to his own will so clearly there is no reason why any Senator should not likewise vote according to the wishes of the electorate.
2. I do not believe that their should be an arbitrary retirement age or pension age, the age of retirement should be determined by medical need or personal choice. Pensions received should be larger or smaller depending on contributions made and people should be able to opt out of social security altogether if they so wish and thus receive no state pension or sickness benefit etc. Clearly they would need to make their own private provisions.
3. I would institute a system of residence permit for all persons who do not have housing qualifications. We are overpopulated and need to remove some of the people that are already here. There should be a general understanding that no further people will be allowed to qualify for housing although persons may be allowed temporary residence to complete fixed term work contracts as required by businesses. If the last 13 years of immigrants were over time denied a residency permit, the population should drop.
4) Roy Le Herissier
____________________________________________________________________________________
David Richardson:-
1 (a) Is it right that to reduce the numbers of Senators.
No but it is forcing constitutional change that we need.
1 (b).
I am seeking constitutional change
2. States Pension
Yes, I would support this but if the recession gets any deeper to, then I would support job share and people working even longer.
3 a). Of course
3b). N/s
4) so far in order of preference Philip Osouf followed by Ian Le Marquand.
5). Depends, if it means that we have to increase GST beyond 10% to fill the budget and there was really no other means of raising taxes, then I would move towards a progressive system.
6). GST retained as need to have some sort of Sales tax, as everybody needs to pay some tax. However do not want to see it go up or taken of chosen items. If taken of chosen items would lead to bureacratic nightmare.
7). a) nearly working
b) allocation of more work to deputies so each one has enough work to get along with so that they don't spend their time wasting States time and can report upwards.
8. Not sure yet.
9. Obviously emphasis on local rather than UK civil servants. But if the quality in anyways is compromised as a result then we should revert (case specific) to bringing in UK civil Servants. The most important factor is quality of service!
10. Road, Ambulance????? (this is a difficult question to answer as I don't yet work in the states.)
Certainly I would like to look at the hours (including voluntary hours) that each employee spends at work and then go from there.
Q 10) on Cutbacks, I would like add that I would, if the recessions continue, go for a cutback of 5 to 10% for senior civil servants, then work downwards in the civil service heirarchy, seek job shares wherever possible and then cutbacks of all unnecessary staff or work. This would be dependent on the need to cutback.
11). Yes but I would like social security contributions cut for the unemployed and for those starting out in a new business.
____________________________________________________________________________________
Mark Forskitt:-
1a/ The way it was done without proper public consultation was not right especially as surveys have shown the public are keen on the Island wide mandate. It might be acceptable to reduce the number of senators as part of a complete package put to and supported by a referendum.
1b/ Lobby the electoral commission once it is set up.
2/ Yes with 1 proviso. I would not be totally against allowing an agreed graduated tailing off of hours for people over say 65 where the employer hires a school leaver or unemployed person and gives them training to take up the vacancy that is coming up. I suspect in the case of many manual workers they will be genuinely on sick benefits before reaching retirement age.
3a/ Yes
3b/ It cannot do so sustainably.
4/ Bob Hill.
5/ Oh Yes.
6/ GST is a regressive tax and I believe in progressive taxation. I campaigned against its introduction because of that. I would rather have consumption taxes on inessential, planet and life damaging, and luxury items. There is no sign of that happening soon locally, so I support the next best option on the table - removal from essentials like food, domestic power and water.
We could have avoided increasing GST if we had found a way to tax non resident non finance companies. That imbalance with locally resident non finance companies is unfair. Correcting this is key to reducing or removing GST, unless we introduce the consumption taxes above.
7a/ The key rationale for ministerial government was to get faster decision making compared to the committee system. It does that, but at a very heavy price. We are close to what John Stuart Mill called the tyranny of the majority.
The current Chief Minister proposed political friends and allies for ministerial and assistant minister positions, thereby breaking the consensual approach the committee system allowed. The excluded members were consigned to scrutiny or oblivion so scrutiny has become a sort of opposition. That is not what scrutiny was intended to be.
7b/ Ministerial government will only work if there some mechanism to hold the COM to account. As Clothier pointed out ministerial government only works in a party oriented system. My preference short term, assuming Clothier is not going to be implemented in full, is to have constables take on leading the scrutiny role, but lose their vote on propositions in the house. That would stop scrutiny being seen as an opposition, and allow the factions in the house to organise politically in formal or informal parties.
8/ This is not an area I know well enough to give a definitive commitment, but it seems a reasonable proposition.
9/ Yes, there should be more work done on career development for local civil servants. J-cats in general were intend to enable short term skills to be brought in so locals could be trained to take on the role once the J-cat expires. It does not seem to be working like that. I proposed in 2008 that we charge fees for J-Cats and use that ring fenced fund to support the education and training of locals with the skills to take up those positions.
10/ The communications unit.
11/ Any social security contributions certainly have to be ring fenced to protect them from being raided by the Treasury. We clearly do have to plan for a future where people are expected to live longer. However I am unconvinced that increasing social security contribution is enough. Increasing building quality so people have to spend less on heating and changing the tariff structure of utilities so consumers of small quantities pay less per unit overall would also help. We also should do a great deal more on preventative health care to avert some of the projected problems.
___________________________________________________________________________________
Rose Colley:-
I respond to your questionnaire as follows:-
1. (a) & (b) No. I am committed to put the options from the Electoral Commission to a referendum and for the States to be bound by the majority vote of the same.
2. Yes.
3. Yes. I am in favour of a work permits or similar.
4. Ian Gorst probably (if elected).
5. Yes. I am certainly in favour of a development tax that is tapered depending on the type of property built.
6. No. It is probably here to stay but should remain at 5% and not be applied to food and utilities.
7. No. I favour a role for as many members as possible and reform of the current scrutiny system.
8. Yes. When in London I was specialised in housing law so I am aware of the effects of an unregulated rented sector. I am also in the rented sector myself.
9. As a former member of the Appointments Commission I favour succession planning if at all possible.
10. Only excessive bureaucracy and 'golden handshakes'. As far as possible front line services should be protected.
11. Possibly.
the choice for Islanders as a whole to choose their political leaders?
1 (b). If no, what would you seek to do about it?
2. The States Pension age is going to be progressively increased over the next few years. Would you support legislation preventing employers from compulsorily retiring people who have not yet qualified for their pension, to prevent them being left without any income other than such welfare as they may qualify for?
3 (a). Would you support measures to stabilise the population at current levels?
3 (b). If not, how do think Jersey can accommodate further population growth?
4. Who will have your support to be the next Chief Minister?
5. Would you like Jersey to move towards a more progressive tax system?
6. Do you think GST should be retained in its present form, abolished, reduced or increased?
7 (a). Is Ministerial Government working the way it was envisaged?
7 (b) If not, what would you do to remedy the situation?
8. With the long-term stagnation of the housing market, the private rental sector is once again growing in importance. Would you support an overhaul of tenancy law to strike a fairer balance of rights and duties between residents and landlords?
9. Do you have a view on whether the extensive importation of UK Civil Service managers on short contracts is beneficial, or whether there should be more emphasis on career development for local civil servants?
10. Which, if any, public services would you like to see the States cutting?
11. Would you support increased Social Security contributions, ring fenced to protect future pension & health benefits, but not as a way of raising income for the Treasury.
_______________________________________________________________________________
Darius Pearce:-
1. It is largely irrelevant the composition and number of States members. What is important that the States chamber works effectively. Whilst people have suggested political parties, I do not believe there is sufficient difference in opinion in Jersey to justify parties. However that removes the link between the wishes of the people and the people in the legislature which would be served by parties (through policy decision which are made at party conferences). The lack of this interaction between the public and the people in the chamber is I believe the root of all Jersey's problems and I would therefore address this by undertaking public surveys of every decision and bringing the results to each debate so the will of the people is clearly evidenced in every debate. David Cameron votes along party lines and not according to his own will so clearly there is no reason why any Senator should not likewise vote according to the wishes of the electorate.
2. I do not believe that their should be an arbitrary retirement age or pension age, the age of retirement should be determined by medical need or personal choice. Pensions received should be larger or smaller depending on contributions made and people should be able to opt out of social security altogether if they so wish and thus receive no state pension or sickness benefit etc. Clearly they would need to make their own private provisions.
3. I would institute a system of residence permit for all persons who do not have housing qualifications. We are overpopulated and need to remove some of the people that are already here. There should be a general understanding that no further people will be allowed to qualify for housing although persons may be allowed temporary residence to complete fixed term work contracts as required by businesses. If the last 13 years of immigrants were over time denied a residency permit, the population should drop.
4) Roy Le Herissier
____________________________________________________________________________________
David Richardson:-
1 (a) Is it right that to reduce the numbers of Senators.
No but it is forcing constitutional change that we need.
1 (b).
I am seeking constitutional change
2. States Pension
Yes, I would support this but if the recession gets any deeper to, then I would support job share and people working even longer.
3 a). Of course
3b). N/s
4) so far in order of preference Philip Osouf followed by Ian Le Marquand.
5). Depends, if it means that we have to increase GST beyond 10% to fill the budget and there was really no other means of raising taxes, then I would move towards a progressive system.
6). GST retained as need to have some sort of Sales tax, as everybody needs to pay some tax. However do not want to see it go up or taken of chosen items. If taken of chosen items would lead to bureacratic nightmare.
7). a) nearly working
b) allocation of more work to deputies so each one has enough work to get along with so that they don't spend their time wasting States time and can report upwards.
8. Not sure yet.
9. Obviously emphasis on local rather than UK civil servants. But if the quality in anyways is compromised as a result then we should revert (case specific) to bringing in UK civil Servants. The most important factor is quality of service!
10. Road, Ambulance????? (this is a difficult question to answer as I don't yet work in the states.)
Certainly I would like to look at the hours (including voluntary hours) that each employee spends at work and then go from there.
Q 10) on Cutbacks, I would like add that I would, if the recessions continue, go for a cutback of 5 to 10% for senior civil servants, then work downwards in the civil service heirarchy, seek job shares wherever possible and then cutbacks of all unnecessary staff or work. This would be dependent on the need to cutback.
11). Yes but I would like social security contributions cut for the unemployed and for those starting out in a new business.
____________________________________________________________________________________
Mark Forskitt:-
1a/ The way it was done without proper public consultation was not right especially as surveys have shown the public are keen on the Island wide mandate. It might be acceptable to reduce the number of senators as part of a complete package put to and supported by a referendum.
1b/ Lobby the electoral commission once it is set up.
2/ Yes with 1 proviso. I would not be totally against allowing an agreed graduated tailing off of hours for people over say 65 where the employer hires a school leaver or unemployed person and gives them training to take up the vacancy that is coming up. I suspect in the case of many manual workers they will be genuinely on sick benefits before reaching retirement age.
3a/ Yes
3b/ It cannot do so sustainably.
4/ Bob Hill.
5/ Oh Yes.
6/ GST is a regressive tax and I believe in progressive taxation. I campaigned against its introduction because of that. I would rather have consumption taxes on inessential, planet and life damaging, and luxury items. There is no sign of that happening soon locally, so I support the next best option on the table - removal from essentials like food, domestic power and water.
We could have avoided increasing GST if we had found a way to tax non resident non finance companies. That imbalance with locally resident non finance companies is unfair. Correcting this is key to reducing or removing GST, unless we introduce the consumption taxes above.
7a/ The key rationale for ministerial government was to get faster decision making compared to the committee system. It does that, but at a very heavy price. We are close to what John Stuart Mill called the tyranny of the majority.
The current Chief Minister proposed political friends and allies for ministerial and assistant minister positions, thereby breaking the consensual approach the committee system allowed. The excluded members were consigned to scrutiny or oblivion so scrutiny has become a sort of opposition. That is not what scrutiny was intended to be.
7b/ Ministerial government will only work if there some mechanism to hold the COM to account. As Clothier pointed out ministerial government only works in a party oriented system. My preference short term, assuming Clothier is not going to be implemented in full, is to have constables take on leading the scrutiny role, but lose their vote on propositions in the house. That would stop scrutiny being seen as an opposition, and allow the factions in the house to organise politically in formal or informal parties.
8/ This is not an area I know well enough to give a definitive commitment, but it seems a reasonable proposition.
9/ Yes, there should be more work done on career development for local civil servants. J-cats in general were intend to enable short term skills to be brought in so locals could be trained to take on the role once the J-cat expires. It does not seem to be working like that. I proposed in 2008 that we charge fees for J-Cats and use that ring fenced fund to support the education and training of locals with the skills to take up those positions.
10/ The communications unit.
11/ Any social security contributions certainly have to be ring fenced to protect them from being raided by the Treasury. We clearly do have to plan for a future where people are expected to live longer. However I am unconvinced that increasing social security contribution is enough. Increasing building quality so people have to spend less on heating and changing the tariff structure of utilities so consumers of small quantities pay less per unit overall would also help. We also should do a great deal more on preventative health care to avert some of the projected problems.
___________________________________________________________________________________
Rose Colley:-
I respond to your questionnaire as follows:-
1. (a) & (b) No. I am committed to put the options from the Electoral Commission to a referendum and for the States to be bound by the majority vote of the same.
2. Yes.
3. Yes. I am in favour of a work permits or similar.
4. Ian Gorst probably (if elected).
5. Yes. I am certainly in favour of a development tax that is tapered depending on the type of property built.
6. No. It is probably here to stay but should remain at 5% and not be applied to food and utilities.
7. No. I favour a role for as many members as possible and reform of the current scrutiny system.
8. Yes. When in London I was specialised in housing law so I am aware of the effects of an unregulated rented sector. I am also in the rented sector myself.
9. As a former member of the Appointments Commission I favour succession planning if at all possible.
10. Only excessive bureaucracy and 'golden handshakes'. As far as possible front line services should be protected.
11. Possibly.
General Election 2011 - Senators - current and former politicians
1 (a). Is it right that the number of Senators has been reduced, thus limiting
the choice for Islanders as a whole to choose their political leaders?
1 (b). If no, what would you seek to do about it?
2. The States Pension age is going to be progressively increased over the next few years. Would you support legislation preventing employers from compulsorily retiring people who have not yet qualified for their pension, to prevent them being left without any income other than such welfare as they may qualify for?
3 (a). Would you support measures to stabilise the population at current levels?
3 (b). If not, how do think Jersey can accommodate further population growth?
4. Who will have your support to be the next Chief Minister?
5. Would you like Jersey to move towards a more progressive tax system?
6. Do you think GST should be retained in its present form, abolished, reduced or increased?
7 (a). Is Ministerial Government working the way it was envisaged?
7 (b) If not, what would you do to remedy the situation?
8. With the long-term stagnation of the housing market, the private rental sector is once again growing in importance. Would you support an overhaul of tenancy law to strike a fairer balance of rights and duties between residents and landlords?
9. Do you have a view on whether the extensive importation of UK Civil Service managers on short contracts is beneficial, or whether there should be more emphasis on career development for local civil servants?
10. Which, if any, public services would you like to see the States cutting?
11. Would you support increased Social Security contributions, ring fenced to protect future pension & health benefits, but not as a way of raising income for the Treasury.
____________________________________________________________________________________
Francis le Gresley:-
1 [a] The reduction in the number of Senators was part of a number of reforms to enable a true general election to take place in October 2014. The proposed Electoral Commission may recommend that the remaining 10 Senators are retained or do away with the position altogether in favour of one States Member as per Clothier. I would favour four or five large constituencies rather than parochial seats.
2. I do not support government interfering in the recruitment or release of staff employed by private businesses. The income support benefit system is there to help individuals who have the required five years continuous residence and who are in need due to unemployment or low income.
3[a]Yes. I am particularly concerned that an estimated 11,000 people with housing qualifications, currently living in the UK or abroad, could return to live in Jersey at anytime. I believe that ultimately the only way to control immigration is to have a system of time-limited work permits similar to the system we currently have for visitors or workers from non EU countries.
4] Of the current declared candidates I would support Ian Gorst but until all the candidates are known it is difficult to say.
5] Yes. I have stated this on numerous occasions in the States and it is in my manifesto.
6] We need the income from GST, estimated to be £80m in 2012, to replace the lost income from the finance industry and companies as a result of the 0/10 regime. I think the underlying rate should be reduced as soon as our finances improve. I would support locally grown fruit, vegetables and local dairy products being exempted from GST.
7] [a] The problem with Ministerial government is that we end up with an exclusive rather than inclusive form of government. The next Chief Minister must embrace talents from all sides of the house. I do not believe the system is broke but I do think we need to reduce the number of States Members down to about 43.
8] The States have already approved the Residential Tenancies Law, although it has not yet come into force. The Health and Social Services Department is also drafting legislation relating to minimum standards in residential accommodation.
9] I definitely believe in career development but accept that from time to time the import of Managers with particular expertise can be beneficial. For example I understand the new Hospital Director has been responsible for making changes which have improved patient care and safety whilst he has also found ways to save significant sums of annual expenditure.
4
10] I do not think we should cut any particular public service but we should continue to look for savings in delivery of services. I think the final salary pension scheme should be closed to new entrants and replaced with a defined contribution scheme. In the long term this would save the States in excess of £6m per year.
11 ] There is no doubt that social security contributions will have to be increased in the future to fund pensions and benefits. All employees can expect a rise of 1.5 % from 2013 for the new long term care benefit scheme.
The proposed rise in employee contributions of 2% for earnings above the lower earnings limit up to the new upper earnings limit of £150,000 has been deferred not abandoned. The money so raised would reduce supplementation by the tax payer of social security contributions for those people who earn below the lower earnings limit of £44,232. I have no problem with this proposal although some people see it as a tax raising measure rather than an increase in contributions.
________________________________________________________________________________
Ian Gorst:-
1a. No. I voted against the reduction in the number of Senators and continue to oppose it.
1b. I will make representations to the Electoral Commission once formed to the effect that the lost seats should be re-instated.
2. I support the increase in pensionable age which will start gradually from 2020. I also support the introduction of discrimination legislation which will be essential to ensure that no one can be made redundant on grounds of age.
3a. I support population control through much stricter control and review of jobs licenses, which will be possible once the new law comes into effect. I made the case for the decision making to be undertaken by the Social Security department so that we could have proper alignment between those out of and looking for work and jobs licenses. Which we will always need some inward migration for nurses and doctors etc I think we should keep our population level below 100,000.
3b. Answered above.
4. I have said that if I am re-elected next week then I will consider standing for the position myself.
5. I have supported exempting food from GST (be that healthy, locally grown or mirroring some other system). This would help to make our current system more progressive.
6. GST should be retained but with exemptions for food.
7a. Ministerial government is working to an extend. It has however made the States chamber a more divided and divisive place, which is to the detriment of the community generally and good government.
7b. All States members should be more involved, either by making make Assistant Ministers or by giving each member a specific job or role to perform i.e.. an alcohol strategy champion.
8. The States have recently introduced new tenancy legislation which addressed some of the previous imbalance.
9.Much more must be done to develop local people. I together with Deputy Egre and Le Herissier developed a succession planning procedure for the States three years ago. We must ensure that it is adhered to.
10. I don’t think the problems are necessarily around cutting public services, but rather about providing them more efficiently and in a more cost effective manner.
11. Yes. Absolutely!
____________________________________________________________________________________
Sir Philip Bailhache:-
I . I do not think that the reduction of the number of senators was a sensible way of dealing with a problem that has eluded a solution for a long time. On the other hand, I do think that there are too many members of the States and that numbers should be reduced. My solution to the problem is set out in broad terms in my manifesto and in speeches made at St. Clement and St. Peter, all of which are on my website at www.philipbailhache.je .
2. Balancing the rights of young people leaving school or college with the rights of people approaching retirement is not easy. For many years people have retired at 65 and made way for youngsters entering the workplace for the first time. If older people are given a legal right to remain in employment indefinitely, that will impact upon the rights of young people, at least for a time. In broad terms of course it must be fair to seek to protect the rights of those whose entitlement to pension will arrive at a later stage.
3. 1 would support measures to seek to limit the increase in the population, but not to prevent it from rising at all, which would be likely to damage the economy to the detriment of all.
4. I do not know who the candidates are going to be, and cannot therefore answer this question.
5. I do not know what is meant by "more progressive tax system". If this means increasing the rate of tax payable by those earning more than a certain limit, I am not in favour, because I believe that it would probably diminish rather than increase the income of the States. A stable tax rate of 20% has been one of the reasons why Jersey's economy has been so successful in the last few decades.
6. I think that GST should be retained in its present form, and at the same rate of 5%.
7. No. My remedy is set out in my manifesto and in speeches given at St Clement and St Peter.
8. I should prefer to see measures taken to diminish the private rental sector by increasing the percentage of people owning their own home. Home ownership is at a lower rate in Jersey than in Guernsey or the UK, and this should be remedied.
9. 1 think that there should be much more emphasis on career development for local civil servants.
10. I do not know of any States services that I would cut.
11. Social Security contributions have recently been increased and I would not at present support any further increases which would, in my view, lead to higher unemployment and depress economic growth.
the choice for Islanders as a whole to choose their political leaders?
1 (b). If no, what would you seek to do about it?
2. The States Pension age is going to be progressively increased over the next few years. Would you support legislation preventing employers from compulsorily retiring people who have not yet qualified for their pension, to prevent them being left without any income other than such welfare as they may qualify for?
3 (a). Would you support measures to stabilise the population at current levels?
3 (b). If not, how do think Jersey can accommodate further population growth?
4. Who will have your support to be the next Chief Minister?
5. Would you like Jersey to move towards a more progressive tax system?
6. Do you think GST should be retained in its present form, abolished, reduced or increased?
7 (a). Is Ministerial Government working the way it was envisaged?
7 (b) If not, what would you do to remedy the situation?
8. With the long-term stagnation of the housing market, the private rental sector is once again growing in importance. Would you support an overhaul of tenancy law to strike a fairer balance of rights and duties between residents and landlords?
9. Do you have a view on whether the extensive importation of UK Civil Service managers on short contracts is beneficial, or whether there should be more emphasis on career development for local civil servants?
10. Which, if any, public services would you like to see the States cutting?
11. Would you support increased Social Security contributions, ring fenced to protect future pension & health benefits, but not as a way of raising income for the Treasury.
____________________________________________________________________________________
Francis le Gresley:-
1 [a] The reduction in the number of Senators was part of a number of reforms to enable a true general election to take place in October 2014. The proposed Electoral Commission may recommend that the remaining 10 Senators are retained or do away with the position altogether in favour of one States Member as per Clothier. I would favour four or five large constituencies rather than parochial seats.
2. I do not support government interfering in the recruitment or release of staff employed by private businesses. The income support benefit system is there to help individuals who have the required five years continuous residence and who are in need due to unemployment or low income.
3[a]Yes. I am particularly concerned that an estimated 11,000 people with housing qualifications, currently living in the UK or abroad, could return to live in Jersey at anytime. I believe that ultimately the only way to control immigration is to have a system of time-limited work permits similar to the system we currently have for visitors or workers from non EU countries.
4] Of the current declared candidates I would support Ian Gorst but until all the candidates are known it is difficult to say.
5] Yes. I have stated this on numerous occasions in the States and it is in my manifesto.
6] We need the income from GST, estimated to be £80m in 2012, to replace the lost income from the finance industry and companies as a result of the 0/10 regime. I think the underlying rate should be reduced as soon as our finances improve. I would support locally grown fruit, vegetables and local dairy products being exempted from GST.
7] [a] The problem with Ministerial government is that we end up with an exclusive rather than inclusive form of government. The next Chief Minister must embrace talents from all sides of the house. I do not believe the system is broke but I do think we need to reduce the number of States Members down to about 43.
8] The States have already approved the Residential Tenancies Law, although it has not yet come into force. The Health and Social Services Department is also drafting legislation relating to minimum standards in residential accommodation.
9] I definitely believe in career development but accept that from time to time the import of Managers with particular expertise can be beneficial. For example I understand the new Hospital Director has been responsible for making changes which have improved patient care and safety whilst he has also found ways to save significant sums of annual expenditure.
4
10] I do not think we should cut any particular public service but we should continue to look for savings in delivery of services. I think the final salary pension scheme should be closed to new entrants and replaced with a defined contribution scheme. In the long term this would save the States in excess of £6m per year.
11 ] There is no doubt that social security contributions will have to be increased in the future to fund pensions and benefits. All employees can expect a rise of 1.5 % from 2013 for the new long term care benefit scheme.
The proposed rise in employee contributions of 2% for earnings above the lower earnings limit up to the new upper earnings limit of £150,000 has been deferred not abandoned. The money so raised would reduce supplementation by the tax payer of social security contributions for those people who earn below the lower earnings limit of £44,232. I have no problem with this proposal although some people see it as a tax raising measure rather than an increase in contributions.
________________________________________________________________________________
Ian Gorst:-
1a. No. I voted against the reduction in the number of Senators and continue to oppose it.
1b. I will make representations to the Electoral Commission once formed to the effect that the lost seats should be re-instated.
2. I support the increase in pensionable age which will start gradually from 2020. I also support the introduction of discrimination legislation which will be essential to ensure that no one can be made redundant on grounds of age.
3a. I support population control through much stricter control and review of jobs licenses, which will be possible once the new law comes into effect. I made the case for the decision making to be undertaken by the Social Security department so that we could have proper alignment between those out of and looking for work and jobs licenses. Which we will always need some inward migration for nurses and doctors etc I think we should keep our population level below 100,000.
3b. Answered above.
4. I have said that if I am re-elected next week then I will consider standing for the position myself.
5. I have supported exempting food from GST (be that healthy, locally grown or mirroring some other system). This would help to make our current system more progressive.
6. GST should be retained but with exemptions for food.
7a. Ministerial government is working to an extend. It has however made the States chamber a more divided and divisive place, which is to the detriment of the community generally and good government.
7b. All States members should be more involved, either by making make Assistant Ministers or by giving each member a specific job or role to perform i.e.. an alcohol strategy champion.
8. The States have recently introduced new tenancy legislation which addressed some of the previous imbalance.
9.Much more must be done to develop local people. I together with Deputy Egre and Le Herissier developed a succession planning procedure for the States three years ago. We must ensure that it is adhered to.
10. I don’t think the problems are necessarily around cutting public services, but rather about providing them more efficiently and in a more cost effective manner.
11. Yes. Absolutely!
____________________________________________________________________________________
Sir Philip Bailhache:-
I . I do not think that the reduction of the number of senators was a sensible way of dealing with a problem that has eluded a solution for a long time. On the other hand, I do think that there are too many members of the States and that numbers should be reduced. My solution to the problem is set out in broad terms in my manifesto and in speeches made at St. Clement and St. Peter, all of which are on my website at www.philipbailhache.je .
2. Balancing the rights of young people leaving school or college with the rights of people approaching retirement is not easy. For many years people have retired at 65 and made way for youngsters entering the workplace for the first time. If older people are given a legal right to remain in employment indefinitely, that will impact upon the rights of young people, at least for a time. In broad terms of course it must be fair to seek to protect the rights of those whose entitlement to pension will arrive at a later stage.
3. 1 would support measures to seek to limit the increase in the population, but not to prevent it from rising at all, which would be likely to damage the economy to the detriment of all.
4. I do not know who the candidates are going to be, and cannot therefore answer this question.
5. I do not know what is meant by "more progressive tax system". If this means increasing the rate of tax payable by those earning more than a certain limit, I am not in favour, because I believe that it would probably diminish rather than increase the income of the States. A stable tax rate of 20% has been one of the reasons why Jersey's economy has been so successful in the last few decades.
6. I think that GST should be retained in its present form, and at the same rate of 5%.
7. No. My remedy is set out in my manifesto and in speeches given at St Clement and St Peter.
8. I should prefer to see measures taken to diminish the private rental sector by increasing the percentage of people owning their own home. Home ownership is at a lower rate in Jersey than in Guernsey or the UK, and this should be remedied.
9. 1 think that there should be much more emphasis on career development for local civil servants.
10. I do not know of any States services that I would cut.
11. Social Security contributions have recently been increased and I would not at present support any further increases which would, in my view, lead to higher unemployment and depress economic growth.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)